Just as Litecoin (LTC) can easily implement it without too much de-listing due to its size
BCH can do better
Just as Litecoin (LTC) can easily implement it without too much de-listing due to its size
BCH can do better
It is a SF and uglier than SegWit at that
@bitcoincashautist fine MW can come to BCH in the form as HF
BCH gets the extra scaling + privacy (along with Zside plan)
sure someone could figure it out how to properly HF MWEB into BCH
i would say best not to discount it (since we already have zcash orchard drivechain plan)
Please be more elaborate, this is Bitcoin Cash Research website, we do research here, not hanging out like on Telegram.
What are the
of this technology?
I would agree with @bitcoincashautist that the implementation of this soft fork (extension blocks) adds so much unnecessary complexity. Besides what are the potential benefits and tech specs of the scheme you are presenting here exactly in the form of HF? You have to be specific.
I think implementing a smart contract that can verify ZKP transactions would be superior and less costly than MWEB. Also, I think a similar idea for Monero as a BCH sidechain would be more appealing